Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • adult (1)
  • female (1)
  • hand strength (1)
  • humans (1)
  • judgment (1)
  • male (1)
  • movement (1)
  • reaction times (2)
  • right hand (5)
  • young adult (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    A right-hand preference for visually-guided grasping has been shown on numerous accounts. Grasping an object requires the integration of both visual and motor components of visuomotor processing. It has been suggested that the left hemisphere plays an integral role in visuomotor functions. The present study serves to investigate whether the visual processing of graspable objects, without any actual reaching or grasping movements, yields a right-hand (left-hemisphere) advantage. Further, we aim to address whether such an advantage is automatically evoked by motor affordances. Two groups of right-handed participants were asked to categorize objects presented on a computer monitor by responding on a keypad. The first group was asked to categorize visual stimuli as graspable (e.g. apple) or non-graspable (e.g. car). A second group categorized the same stimuli but as nature-made (e.g. apple) or man-made (e.g. car). Reaction times were measured in response to the visually presented stimuli. Results showed a right-hand advantage for graspable objects only when participants were asked to respond to the graspable/non-graspable categorization. When participants were asked to categorize objects as nature-made or man-made, a right-hand advantage for graspable objects did not emerge. The results suggest that motor affordances may not always be automatic and might require conscious representations that are appropriate for object interaction. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Citation

    Nicole Netelenbos, Claudia L R Gonzalez. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge. Brain and cognition. 2015 Feb;93:18-25

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags


    PMID: 25483823

    View Full Text