Daniel E Abbott, Gregory A Dumanian, Amy L Halverson
Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. abbottdan@sbcglobal.net
The American surgeon 2007 DecMany studies identify risk factors for dehiscence, but a paucity of data exist suggesting an optimal treatment strategy. This study examines repair of abdominal wound dehiscence, comparing closure and interposition of mesh. We conducted a retrospective review of 37 individuals who suffered a wound dehiscence after laparotomy. Outcomes of repairs with either primary closure or polyglactin mesh interposition were examined. Twenty-seven individuals underwent repair with primary closure. Twelve of these individuals suffered repeat wound dehiscence; 10 were treated with repeat fascial closure, 2 with polyglactin mesh interposition. Seven individuals initially underwent successful repair with polyglactin mesh interposition; all subsequently had their hernias repaired. Three patients had minor fascial separation managed nonoperatively. Primary closure is associated with a relatively high rate of recurrent wound dehiscence. Closure with polyglactin mesh interposition has a higher initial success rate, but necessitates additional surgeries for repair of the abdominal wall defect.
Daniel E Abbott, Gregory A Dumanian, Amy L Halverson. Management of laparotomy wound dehiscence. The American surgeon. 2007 Dec;73(12):1224-7
PMID: 18186376
View Full Text