Tomoyuki Kabutoya, Joji Ishikawa, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuo Eguchi, Kazuyuki Shimada, Kazuomi Kario
Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) 2009 AugIn this study, we evaluated whether antihypertensive therapy using a home blood pressure monitor (HBPM) equipped with a graphic display of weekly and monthly averaged blood pressure (BP) can obtain better BP control than the conventional HBPM. Sixty-five hypertensive outpatients who had HBP >135/85 mm Hg were enrolled by 8 doctors in 2 different hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned either a graph-equipped HBPM (graph-equipped HBPM group; n=33) or an HBPM without the graph function (conventional HBPM group; n=32). The patients were treated with antihypertensive medications targeting HBP <135/85 mm Hg. After 2 months, the home systolic BP level was lower in the graph-equipped HBPM group than in the conventional HBPM group (141.3+/-15.4 vs 147.7+/-10.8 mm Hg; P<.05); its reduction was significantly larger in the former group (11.9 vs 5.6 mm Hg; P<.05). Using an HBP device with a graphic display could accelerate the achievement of BP control.
Tomoyuki Kabutoya, Joji Ishikawa, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuo Eguchi, Kazuyuki Shimada, Kazuomi Kario. A home blood pressure monitor equipped with a graphic function facilitates faster blood pressure control than the conventional home blood pressure monitor. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). 2009 Aug;11(8):422-5
PMID: 19695029
View Full Text