Fabiana D Mendes, Lu Shi Chen, André Borges, Tainah Babadópulos, Jaime O Ilha, Khalid M Alkharfy, Gustavo D Mendes, Gilberto De Nucci
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas/SP, Brazil.
Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences 2011 Aug 15A rapid, sensitive and specific method for quantifying ciprofibrate in human plasma using bezafibrate as the internal standard (IS) is described. The sample was acidified prior extraction with formic acid (88%). The analyte and the IS were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction using an organic solvent (diethyl ether/dichloromethane 70/30 (v/v)). The extracts were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Chromatography was performed using Genesis C18 4 μm analytical column (4.6 × 150 mm i.d.) and a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile/water (70/30, v/v) and 1mM acetic acid. The method had a chromatographic run time of 3.4 min and a linear calibration curve over the range 0.1-60 μg/mL (r>0.99). The limit of quantification was 0.1 μg/mL. The intra- and interday accuracy and precision values of the assay were less than 13.5%. The stability tests indicated no significant degradation. The recovery of ciprofibrate was 81.2%, 73.3% and 76.2% for the 0.3, 5.0 and 48.0 ng/mL standard concentrations, respectively. For ciprofibrate, the optimized parameters of the declustering potential, collision energy and collision exit potential were -51 V, -16 eV and -5 V, respectively. The method was also validated without the use of the internal standard. This HPLC-MS/MS procedure was used to assess the bioequivalence of two ciprofibrate 100mg tablet formulations in healthy volunteers of both sexes. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained from the ciprofibrate plasma concentration vs. time curves: AUC(last), AUC(0-168 h), C(max) and T(max). The geometric mean with corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for test/reference percent ratios were 93.80% (90% CI=88.16-99.79%) for C(max,) 98.31% (90% CI=94.91-101.83%) for AUC(last) and 97.67% (90% CI=94.45-101.01%) for AUC(0-168 h). Since the 90% CI for AUC(last), AUC(0-168 h) and C(max) ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the US FDA, it was concluded that ciprofibrate (Lipless 100mg tablet) formulation manufactured by Biolab Sanus Farmacêutica Ltda. is bioequivalent to the Oroxadin (100 mg tablet) formulation for both the rate and the extent of absorption. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Fabiana D Mendes, Lu Shi Chen, André Borges, Tainah Babadópulos, Jaime O Ilha, Khalid M Alkharfy, Gustavo D Mendes, Gilberto De Nucci. Ciprofibrate quantification in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies. Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 2011 Aug 15;879(24):2361-8
PMID: 21763220
View Full Text