Naturally acquired rabies virus infections in wild-caught bats.

The study of a zoonotic disease requires an understanding of the disease incidence in animal reservoirs. Rabies incidence in bats submitted to diagnostic laboratories does not accurately reflect the true incidence in wild bat populations as a bias exists for testing bats that have been in contact with humans or pets. This article details the rabies incidence in two species of bats collected from natural settings without such bias. In this study, brain smears from 0.6% and 2.5% of wild-caught and apparently healthy Tadarida brasiliensis and Eptesicus fuscus, respectively, were positive for rabies virus (RV) antigen. Conversely, 92% of the grounded T. brasiliensis were positive for RV. Serology performed on captive colony and sick bats reveal an immune response to rabies. This work illustrates the complex interplay between immunity, disease state, and the conundrum of RV maintenance in bats.

Citation

April Davis, Paul Gordy, Robert Rudd, Jodie A Jarvis, Richard A Bowen. Naturally acquired rabies virus infections in wild-caught bats. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.). 2012 Jan;12(1):55-60

Mesh Tags

Substances

PMID: 21923271

search → result