How do the top 12 pharmaceutical companies operate safety pharmacology?

How does safety pharmacology operate in large pharmaceutical companies today? By understanding our current position, can we prepare safety pharmacology to successfully navigate the complex process of drug discovery and development? A short anonymous survey was conducted, by invitation, to safety pharmacology representatives of the top 12 pharmaceutical companies, as defined by 2009 revenue figures. A series of multiple choice questions was designed to explore group size, accountabilities, roles and responsibilities of group members, outsourcing policy and publication record. A 92% response rate was obtained. Six out of 11 companies have 10 to 30 full time equivalents in safety pharmacology, who hold similar roles and responsibilities; although the majority of members are not qualified at PhD level or equivalent. Accountabilities were similar across companies and all groups have accountability for core battery in vivo studies and problem solving activities but differences do exist for example with in vitro safety screening and pharmacodynamic/pharmokinetic modeling (PK/PD). The majority of companies outsource less than 25% of studies, with in vitro profiling being the most commonly outsourced activity. Finally, safety pharmacology groups are publishing 1 to 4 articles each year. This short survey has highlighted areas of similarity and differences in the way large pharmaceutical companies operate safety pharmacology. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Citation

Lorna Ewart, David J Gallacher, Gary Gintant, Jean-Michel Guillon, Derek Leishman, Paul Levesque, Nick McMahon, Lou Mylecraine, Martin Sanders, Willi Suter, Rob Wallis, Jean-Pierre Valentin. How do the top 12 pharmaceutical companies operate safety pharmacology? Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. 2012 Sep;66(2):66-70

Mesh Tags

Substances

PMID: 22510338

search → result