Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

There is no consensus for the best testicular sperm extraction (TESE) technique in patients with "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). To determine sperm retrieval rates in an intraindividual comparison using three locations of the testicle with and without the assistance of a microscope (microsurgical TESE [M-TESE]). A series of 65 patients with low-chance NOA presenting with low testicular volume (<8 ml) and high serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (>12.4 IU/l) underwent trifocal-TESE plus M-TESE bilaterally (four biopsies per testis). Sperm retrieval was performed as trifocal-TESE (upper, middle, and lower testicular pole) with and without the assistance of a microscope in the middle incision. The number of evaluated tubules, the mean spermatogenetic scores, and the sperm retrieval rates were evaluated to determine retrieval locations and the use of the microscope. The Friedman and Cochrane Q tests were applied to determine statistical differences. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for the analysis of serum FSH and testicular volume as preoperative prognostic factors. The sperm retrieval success of 66.2% using the combined technique, meaning the percentage of patients with at least one tubule containing elongated spermatids, was the highest in the combination of trifocal- and M-TESE (p<0.01), indicating this technique as optimal for patients with low-chance NOA. M-TESE and trifocal-TESE alone were not significantly better. The mean spermatogenetic score giving the number of tubules with elongated spermatids in relation to all tubules was significantly higher in M-TESE versus conventional TESE (p<0.01), indicating the superior quality of the tissue harvested using the microscope. These results are limited by the definition of "success" using "one" spermatid/tubule. Preoperatively, high serum FSH and low testicular volumes did not exclude successful sperm retrieval. The combination of trifocal- and M-TESE is the best technique to reach high sperm retrieval rates in patients with low-chance NOA. Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Citation

Marcelo Marconi, Andreas Keudel, Thorsten Diemer, Martin Bergmann, Klaus Steger, Hans-Christian Schuppe, Wolfgang Weidner. Combined trifocal and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the best technique for testicular sperm retrieval in "low-chance" nonobstructive azoospermia. European urology. 2012 Oct;62(4):713-9

Expand section icon Mesh Tags

Expand section icon Substances


PMID: 22521095

View Full Text