Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


This study aimed to evaluate the interference of tobacco smoke on immunochromatography assay of urinary drug detection. Our study included 256 voluntary subjects (143 passive smokers and 113 current smokers). Cotinine was measured by immunoenzymatic method and thiocyanates (SCN(-)) by selective electrode. Urinary drug was detected by immunochromatography assay. A positive result is completed by an analytical method with an immunometric assay. False positive results for benzodiazepines are significantly more frequent in smokers compared with passive smokers (90.2% Vs 22.4%; χ(2) = 116.62, p < 10(-3)). For smokers, the number of cigarettes was significantly higher in subjects with falsely positive results for benzodiazepines compared with subjects with negative results (32 ± 11 Vs 20 ± 10; p = 0.04). Between these two groups, we established a significant difference for urinary cotinine (345 ± 211 Vs 117 ± 54 μg/μmol; p < 10(-3)) and for plasma SCN(-) (101.6 ± 3.4 Vs 98.8 ± 2.1 μmol/L; p = 10(-3)). Urinary cotinine and consumption duration present the highest values of areas under curves (AUC) of the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. The cut-off of 167.6 μg/μmol and 10.5 years were found as predictive factors of false positive results. Tobacco smoke interferes with immunochromatography assay of urinary drug detection; therefore, all subjects must be questioned about their smoking status to avoid such false results during results interpretation. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.

Citation

Dhouha Haj Mouhamed, Asma Ezzaher, Hajer Mabrouk, Mohamed Hachem Sâadaoui, Fadoua Neffati, Wahiba Douki, Lotfi Gaha, Mohamed Fadhel Najjar. Interference of tobacco smoke with immunochromatography assay for urinary drug detection. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2012 Oct;19(7):369-72

Expand section icon Mesh Tags

Expand section icon Substances


PMID: 22920757

View Full Text