Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions

In stratified matched-pair studies, risk difference between two proportions is one of the most frequently used indices in comparing efficiency between two treatments or diagnostic tests. This article presents five simultaneous confidence intervals and two bootstrap simultaneous confidence intervals for risk differences in stratified matched-pair designs. The proposed confidence intervals are evaluated with respect to their coverage probabilities, expected widths, and ratios of the mesial noncoverage to noncoverage probability. Empirical results show that (1) hybrid simultaneous confidence intervals outperform nonhybrid simultaneous confidence intervals; (2) hybrid simultaneous confidence intervals based on median estimator outperform those based on maximum likelihood estimator; and (3) hybrid simultaneous confidence intervals incorporated with Wilson score and Agresti coull intervals and the bootstrap t-percentile simultaneous interval based on median unbiased estimators behave satisfactorily for small to large sample sizes in the sense that their empirical coverage probabilities are close to the prespecified nominal confidence level, and their ratios of the mesial noncoverage to noncoverage probabilities lie in [0.4,0.6] and are hence recommended. Real examples from clinical studies are used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.


Nian-Sheng Tang, Shi-Fang Qiu, Man-Lai Tang, Guang-Yong Zou, Dan Yu. Simultaneous confidence intervals of risk differences in stratified paired designs. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics. 2013 Mar 11;23(2):361-77

Expand section icon Mesh Tags

Expand section icon Substances

PMID: 23437944

View Full Text