Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently. © 2019 The Authors. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citation

Brooke Levis, Dean McMillan, Ying Sun, Chen He, Danielle B Rice, Ankur Krishnan, Yin Wu, Marleine Azar, Tatiana A Sanchez, Matthew J Chiovitti, Parash Mani Bhandari, Dipika Neupane, Nazanin Saadat, Kira E Riehm, Mahrukh Imran, Jill T Boruff, Pim Cuijpers, Simon Gilbody, John P A Ioannidis, Lorie A Kloda, Scott B Patten, Ian Shrier, Roy C Ziegelstein, Liane Comeau, Nicholas D Mitchell, Marcello Tonelli, Simone N Vigod, Franca Aceti, Rubén Alvarado, Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel, Muideen O Bakare, Jacqueline Barnes, Cheryl Tatano Beck, Carola Bindt, Philip M Boyce, Adomas Bunevicius, Tiago Castro E Couto, Linda H Chaudron, Humberto Correa, Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo, Valsamma Eapen, Michelle Fernandes, Barbara Figueiredo, Jane R W Fisher, Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve, Lisa Giardinelli, Nadine Helle, Louise M Howard, Dina Sami Khalifa, Jane Kohlhoff, Laima Kusminskas, Zoltán Kozinszky, Lorenzo Lelli, Angeliki A Leonardou, Beth A Lewis, Michael Maes, Valentina Meuti, Sandra Nakić Radoš, Purificación Navarro García, Daisuke Nishi, Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Emma Robertson-Blackmore, Tamsen J Rochat, Heather J Rowe, Bonnie W M Siu, Alkistis Skalkidou, Alan Stein, Robert C Stewart, Kuan-Pin Su, Inger Sundström-Poromaa, Meri Tadinac, S Darius Tandon, Iva Tendais, Pavaani Thiagayson, Annamária Töreki, Anna Torres-Giménez, Thach D Tran, Kylee Trevillion, Katherine Turner, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier, Karen Wynter, Kimberly A Yonkers, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D Thombs. Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis. International journal of methods in psychiatric research. 2019 Dec;28(4):e1803

Mesh Tags

PMID: 31568624

search → result