A Simple Approach to Adjust for Case-Mix When Comparing Institutional Cesarean Birth Rates.

This study aimed to develop a validated model to predict intrapartum cesarean in nulliparous women and to use it to adjust for case-mix when comparing institutional laboring cesarean birth (CB) rates. This multicenter retrospective study used chart-abstracted data on nulliparous, singleton, term births over a 7-year period. Prelabor cesareans were excluded. Logistic regression was used to predict the probability of CB for individual pregnancies. Thirty-five potential predictive variables were evaluated including maternal demographics, prepregnancy health, pregnancy characteristics, and newborn weight and gender. Models were trained on 21,017 births during 2011 to 2015 (training cohort), and accuracy assessed by prediction on 15,045 births during 2016 to 2017 (test cohort). Six variables delivered predictive success equivalent to the full set of 35 variables: maternal weight, height, and age, gestation at birth, medically-indicated induction, and birth weight. Internal validation within the training cohort gave a receiver operator curve with area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.722. External validation using the test cohort gave ROC-AUC of 0.722 (0.713-0.731 confidence interval). When comparing observed and predicted CB rates at 16 institutions in the test cohort, five had significantly lower than predicted rates and three had significantly higher than predicted rates. Six routine clinical variables used to adjust for case-mix can identify outliers when comparing institutional CB rates. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Citation

James Jeffry Howbert, Ellen Kauffman, Kristin Sitcov, Vivienne Souter. A Simple Approach to Adjust for Case-Mix When Comparing Institutional Cesarean Birth Rates. American journal of perinatology. 2021 Mar;38(4):370-376

PMID: 31683324

search → result