Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • adult (1)
  • cardiac edema (3)
  • contrast media (2)
  • edema (13)
  • fast (7)
  • female (2)
  • free (7)
  • gadolinium (3)
  • humans (1)
  • new york (1)
  • patients (3)
  • prepared (2)
  • pulses (5)
  • segments (1)
  • signal (1)
  • volunteers (2)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

     To compare true positive and false negative results of myocardial edema mapping in two methods. Myocardial edema may be difficult to detect on cardiac MRI.  76 patients (age 59 ± 11 years, 15 female) with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and 10 healthy volunteers were prospectively included in this single-center study. 1.5 T cardiac MRI was performed in patients 2.5 days after revascularization (median) for edema mapping: Steady State Free Precession (SSFP) mapping sequence with T2-preparation pulses (T2prep); and dual-contrast Fast Spin-Echo (dcFSE) signal decay edema mapping. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was used as the reference for expected edema in acute MI.  311 myocardial segments in patients were acutely infarcted with mean T2 73 ms for T2prep SSFP vs. 87 ms for dcFSE edema mapping. In healthy volunteers the mean T2 was 56 ms for T2prep SSFP vs. 50 ms for dcFSE edema mapping. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for T2prep SSFP show area under the curve (AUC) 0.962, p < 0.0001, Youden index J 0.8266, associated criterion > 60 ms, sensitivity 94 %, specificity 89 %. dcFSE ROC AUC 0.979, p < 0.0001, J 0.9219, associated criterion > 64 ms, sensitivity 93 %, specificity 99 %.  Both edema mapping methods indicate high-grade edema with high sensitivity. Nevertheless, edema in acute infarction may be focally underestimated in both mapping methods.   · Sensitivity for edema detection is high for both methods.. · Edema may be focally underestimated by T2prep SSFP edema mapping and dcFSE mapping.. · Krumm P, Martirosian P, Rath D et al. Performance of two Methods for Cardiac MRI Edema Mapping: Dual-Contrast Fast Spin-Echo and T2 Prepared Balanced Steady State Free Precession. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 669 - 677. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

    Citation

    Patrick Krumm, Petros Martirosian, Dominik Rath, Meinrad Gawaz, Konstantin Nikolaou, Bernhard Daniel Klumpp, Andreas Hornung, Ulrich Kramer, Fritz Schick, Tobias Geisler, Tanja Zitzelsberger. Performance of two Methods for Cardiac MRI Edema Mapping: Dual-Contrast Fast Spin-Echo and T2 Prepared Balanced Steady State Free Precession. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2020 Jul;192(7):669-677

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 32018303

    View Full Text