Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • alberta (1)
  • canada (1)
  • function clinics (4)
  • heart (8)
  • odds ratio (3)
  • patients (8)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is lifesaving; however, real-world data regarding the proportion of patients eligible for a primary prevention ICD and subsequent use remain sparse. This study evaluated rates of primary prevention ICD eligibility and use among patients in heart function clinics (HFCs) and to identify reasons for nonimplantation. A retrospective study was performed of patients seen at HFCs in Alberta, Canada, from 2013 to 2015. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical indications, and reasons for nonimplantation were abstracted. Eligibility was defined according to the 2008 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society ICD, 2012 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society Focused Update, and 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy guidelines. Logistic regression was used to calculate an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for predictors of nonimplantation. Among 1239 patients in HFCs, the median age was 70 years (interquartile range, 59-80), 67% were male, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.40 (interquartile range, 0.28-0.53). Overall, 45% of patients (n = 553) met guideline criteria for an ICD, and of those, 36% (n = 198) received a device. Among device nonrecipients, 52% (n = 185) had no documented reason for nonimplantation. The most common reason for nonimplantation among nonrecipients was patient preference (48%). Predictors associated with nonimplantation were age more than 75 years (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.31-2.82) and history of cancer (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.07-4.78). At 3 years follow-up, 27% of nonrecipients were deceased. We found that one-third of patients who met guideline criteria received an ICD and that documentation for nonimplantation was poor. © 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.

    Citation

    Rochelle Bernier, Jessica Ng, Dat T Tran, Evan Lockwood, Lucy Reyes, Karen Cowan, Nowell M Fine, Justin Ezekowitz, Derek V Exner, Satish R Raj, Roopinder K Sandhu. A Population-Based Study of Device Eligibility, Use, and Reasons for Nonimplantation in Patients at Heart Function Clinics. CJC open. 2019 Jul;1(4):173-181


    PMID: 32159104

    View Full Text