Evaluation of New Monoclonal Anti-MyoD1 (MX049) for the Diagnosis of Rhabdomyosarcoma: Comparison with 5.8A, EP212, Anti-Desmin, Anti-Myogenin, and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization.

Yihui He, Xin Chen, Xunbin Yu

Annals of clinical and laboratory science 2020 May

filter terms:

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a primitive embryonal mesenchymal neoplasm demonstrating skeletal muscle differentiation. Diagnosis of RMS remains difficult due to the diversity of clinical features, pathological forms, and lesion's locations. Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization are common methods used to aid RMS diagnosis. In this research we tested protein expression of Desmin (Clone MX046), MyoD1 (Clone MX049), MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A), MyoD1 (Clone EP212), Myogenin (Clone F5D), and cytogenetic features in 21 RMS cases, with following results: positive rates of Desmin (Clone MX046), MyoD1 (Clone MX049), MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A), MyoD1 (Clone EP212) and Myogenin (Clone F5D) were 100.00%, 100.00%, 90.48%, 95.24% and 85.71%, respectively, with cytoplasmic stains of MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A) in 38.10% (8/21) cases and only nuclear stains of MyoD1 (Clone EP212), MyoD1 (Clone MX049) in all positive cases. FOXO1 gene was detected apart in 9 alveolar RMS samples, where MyoD1 (Clone MX049), MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A) and MyoD1 (Clone EP212) were 100% positive but MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A) only 44.44% (4/9). Thus we believe MyoD1 (Clone MX049) performs more sensitive and specific than MyoD1 (Clone 5.8A) and MyoD1 (Clone EP212). © 2020 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.

Citation

Yihui He, Xin Chen, Xunbin Yu. Evaluation of New Monoclonal Anti-MyoD1 (MX049) for the Diagnosis of Rhabdomyosarcoma: Comparison with 5.8A, EP212, Anti-Desmin, Anti-Myogenin, and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization. Annals of clinical and laboratory science. 2020 May;50(3):412-416