Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Anesthesia is needed to ensure both maternal and fetal safety during cesarean sections. This retrospective cohort study compared maternal and fetal outcomes between general and spinal anesthesia for cesarean section based on perioperative hemodynamic parameters (pre- and postoperative systolic blood pressure, heart rate), mean difference of hematocrit and estimated blood loss, and neonatal Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min. Data from electronic medical records of 331 singleton pregnancies between January 2016 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively; 44 cases were excluded, and 287 cases were assigned to the general group (n = 141) or spinal group (n = 146). Postoperative hemodynamic parameters were significantly higher in the general group than the spinal group (systolic blood pressure: 136.8 ± 16.7 vs. 119.3 ± 12.7 mmHg, heart rate: 93.2 ± 16.8 vs. 71.0 ± 12.7 beats/min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean difference between the pre- and postoperative hematocrit was also significantly greater in the general than spinal group (4.8 ± 3.4% vs. 2.3 ± 3.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the spinal than general group (819.9 ± 81.9 vs. 856.7 ± 117.9 ml, P < 0.001). There was a significantly larger proportion of newborns with 5-min Apgar scores < 7 in the general than spinal group (6/141 [4.3%] vs. 0/146 [0%], respectively, P = 0.012). General group is associated with more maternal blood loss and a larger proportion of newborns with 5-min Apgar scores < 7 than spinal group during cesarean sections.

Citation

Tae-Yun Sung, Young Seok Jee, Hwang-Ju You, Choon-Kyu Cho. Comparison of the effect of general and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section on maternal and fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Anesthesia and pain medicine. 2021 Jan;16(1):49-55

PMID: 33389986

search → result