Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • america (1)
  • androgen (4)
  • bone metastasis (1)
  • humans (1)
  • lymph node (1)
  • metastasis (3)
  • OMPC (5)
  • patients (1)
  • physician (1)
  • positron (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    With the current movement toward treating oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (OMPC), we design a study with the objective of gathering opinions regarding what would be considered a clinically significant benefit from such treatments. Data was collected from physicians of the Society of Urologic Oncology using a self-administered questionnaire using SurveyMonkey. The questionnaire was designed to obtain characteristics on clinical practice of the respondents, definitions used for OMPC and also what would be considered a clinically significant benefit according to the respondents. We present a descriptive analysis of the responses obtained. We obtained 119 responses (response rate of 12.6%) after sending the questionnaire twice with one month apart. Most of them being staff/faculty (89%) practicing in the United States of America (84.87%). Most of the responders referred that a significant proportion of their practice comes from PC patients. Most defined OMPC <3 bone/lymph node metastasis seen with conventional imaging, only 26.9% of the responders used positron emission tomography. Regarding the clinical benefit of metastasis-oriented treatment, a curing rate >10% or an increase in 1 year of androgen deprivation therapy-free survival would make the treatment worthwhile. We present examples of sample size calculations for future clinical trials using these parameters as an expected "clinically-significant" benefit. This study shows that most clinicians still support the use of conventional imaging to define OMPC. Our findings show that a curing rate of a minimum of 11% and an androgen deprivation therapy-free survival at 1 year are considered clinically significant and this should be used for estimating the sample size in future clinical trials. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Citation

    Jaime O Herrera-Caceres, Alexandra Gleave, Katherine Lajkosz, Hanan Goldberg, Dixon T S Woon, Mohamad B Berjaoui, Yazan Qaoud, Marian S Wettstein, Ardalan E Ahmad, Robert Hamilton, Girish Kulkari, Neil Fleshner. Defining oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer and clinically significant outcomes: Implications on clinical trials? Urologic oncology. 2021 Jul;39(7):431.e1-431.e8

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 33495118

    View Full Text