Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden as a Marker of Success Following Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Structural Heart Disease.

There is little emphasis on the efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) when using VA burden reduction as a marker for success. We examined the efficacy of catheter ablation using VA burden, rather than VA recurrence as a marker of success, following catheter ablation of structural heart disease (SHD) related VA. Catheter ablation of SHD related VA was performed at a single centre over 4-years. VA episodes and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies were recorded over the 6-months before and after final ablation. Outcomes were reported in terms of burden reduction and compared to singular VA recurrence. Overall, 108 patients were included in the study. Mean age 64.2±13.9 years, 86% male, mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 42±16%. Median VA episodes and ICD therapy were significantly reduced after ablation (VA before: 10 [interquartile range, IQR: 2-38] vs. VA after: 0 [IQR: 0-2], p<0.001; anti-tachycardia pacing [ATP] before: 16 (IQR: 1.5-57) vs. ATP after: 0 [IQR: 0-2], p<0.001; shocks before: 1 [IQR: 0-5] vs. shocks after: 0 [IQR: 0-0], p<0.001). Procedural success at 6-months was significantly higher when considering ≥75% reduction in VA burden, rather than a singular VA-free survival (83% vs. 67%, p=0.001). The vast majority (>80%) of patients achieve reduction in VA burden (≥75% reduction) after catheter ablation for VA. This data suggests that catheter ablation is highly therapeutic when procedure success is defined as reduction in VA, rather than using a single VA recurrence as a metric for failure. Copyright © 2021. The Korean Society of Cardiology.

Citation

Richard Bennett, Samual Turnbull, Yasuhito Kotake, Timothy Campbell, Saurabh Kumar. Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden as a Marker of Success Following Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Structural Heart Disease. Korean circulation journal. 2021 May;51(5):455-468

PMID: 33764012

search → result