Judy Sein Kim, Brianna Aheimer, Verónica Montané Manrara, Marina Bedny
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2021 Aug 17Empiricist philosophers such as Locke famously argued that people born blind might learn arbitrary color facts (e.g., marigolds are yellow) but would lack color understanding. Contrary to this intuition, we find that blind and sighted adults share causal understanding of color, despite not always agreeing about arbitrary color facts. Relative to sighted people, blind individuals are less likely to generate "yellow" for banana and "red" for stop sign but make similar generative inferences about real and novel objects' colors, and provide similar causal explanations. For example, people infer that two natural kinds (e.g., bananas) and two artifacts with functional colors (e.g., stop signs) are more likely to have the same color than two artifacts with nonfunctional colors (e.g., cars). People develop intuitive and inferentially rich "theories" of color regardless of visual experience. Linguistic communication is more effective at aligning intuitive theories than knowledge of arbitrary facts.
Judy Sein Kim, Brianna Aheimer, Verónica Montané Manrara, Marina Bedny. Shared understanding of color among sighted and blind adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2021 Aug 17;118(33)
PMID: 34385310
View Full Text