Evaluating tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction: a comparison of in vivo response to meshes implanted in rats.

Xiaojuan Wang, Yisong Chen, Zhongyong Fan, Keqin Hua

International urogynecology journal 2022 Aug

filter terms:

Achieving better anatomic restoration and decreasing the associated complications are necessary for material repair of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). This study was aimed to investigate host response to tissue-engineered repair material (TERM) in rat models by comparing different materials and study the changes in biomechanical properties over time. TERM was constructed by seeding adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) on electrospun poly(L-lactide)-trimethylene carbonate-glycolide (PLTG) terpolymers. The TERM, PLTG, porcine small intestine submucosa mesh (SIS), and polypropylene (PP) (n = 6 / group per time point) were implanted in rats for 7, 30, 60, and 90 days. Hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome staining were used to assess the host response, and mechanical testing was used to evaluate the changes in biomechanical properties. In vivo imaging showed that the ADSCs were confined to the abdominal wall and did not migrate to other organs or tissues. The TERM was encapsulated by a thicker layer of connective tissue and was associated with less reduced inflammatory scores compared with PLTG and PP over time. The vascularization of the TERM was greater than that with PP and PLTG over time (p < 0.05) and was greater than that with SIS on day 90. The ultimate tensile strain and Young's modulus of the PP group showed the greatest increases, and the TERM group followed on day 90. This TERM achieved better host integration in rat models and better biomechanical properties, and it may be an alternative material for PFD. © 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.

Citation

Xiaojuan Wang, Yisong Chen, Zhongyong Fan, Keqin Hua. Evaluating tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction: a comparison of in vivo response to meshes implanted in rats. International urogynecology journal. 2022 Aug;33(8):2143-2150