Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • adult (1)
  • ag 213 (1)
  • antigen (1)
  • antigens viral (2)
  • cases (1)
  • coronavirus (1)
  • female (2)
  • health facilities (1)
  • humans (1)
  • patients (3)
  • PPV (2)
  • rapid (1)
  • sars cov (5)
  • viral load (1)
  • young adult (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently finally determined in laboratory settings by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase-chain-reaction (rt-PCR). However, simple testing with immediately available results are crucial to gain control over COVID-19. The aim was to evaluate such a point-of-care antigen rapid test (AG-rt) device in its performance compared to laboratory-based rt-PCR testing in COVID-19 suspected, symptomatic patients. For this prospective study, two specimens each of 541 symptomatic female (54.7%) and male (45.3%) patients aged between 18 and 95 years tested at five emergency departments (ED, n = 296) and four primary healthcare centres (PHC, n = 245), were compared, using AG-rt (positive/negative/invalid) and rt-PCR (positive/negative and cycle threshold, Ct) to diagnose SARS-CoV-2. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR+/-) of the AG-rt were assessed. Differences between ED and PHC were detected regarding gender, age, symptoms, disease prevalence, and diagnostic performance. Overall, 174 (32.2%) were tested positive on AG-rt and 213 (39.4%) on rt-PCR. AG correctly classified 91.7% of all rt-PCR positive cases with a sensitivity of 80.3%, specificity of 99.1%, PPV of 98.3, NPV of 88.6%, LR(+) of 87.8, and LR(-) of 0.20. The highest sensitivities and specificities of AG-rt were detected in PHC (sensitivity: 84.4%, specificity: 100.0%), when using Ct of 30 as cut-off (sensitivity: 92.5%, specificity: 97.8%), and when symptom onset was within the first three days (sensitivity: 82.9%, specificity: 99.6%). The highest sensitivity was detected with a high viral load. Our findings suggest that AG-rt are comparable to rt-PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected symptomatic patients presenting both at emergency departments and primary health care centres.

    Citation

    Rainer Thell, Verena Kallab, Wolfgang Weinhappel, Wolfgang Mueckstein, Lukas Heschl, Martina Heschl, Stefan Korsatko, Franz Toedling, Amelie Blaschke, Theresa Herzog, Anna Klicpera, Clara Koeller, Moritz Haugk, Anna Kreil, Alexander Spiel, Philipp Kreuzer, Robert Krause, Christian Sebesta, Stefan Winkler, Brenda Laky, Marton Szell. Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. PloS one. 2021;16(11):e0259527

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 34843505

    View Full Text