Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • controls group (1)
  • discomfort (10)
  • hyperacusis (8)
  • patients (6)
  • reflect (1)
  • suggest (1)
  • tinnitus (3)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    The aims of this study were to investigate the test-retest reliability of measurements of loudness discomfort levels (LDLs), to suggest cut-off values for diagnosing patients with hyperacusis, and to evaluate the clinical value of-LDL measurements as a test for monitoring hyperacusis. For the test-retest reliability of LDL measurements (study 1), a total of 68 patients who sought consultations at our clinic were subcategorized into four groups: patients with tinnitus (group 1), tinnitus and hearing loss (group 2), hyperacusis (group 3), and normal controls (group 4). Inter-hour and inter-day test-retest reliability values using different stimuli were investigated. For study 2, the clinical value of LDL measurements using pure tone stimuli was analyzed by comparing changes after sound generator use in patients with hyperacusis. In study 1, the group 3 patients showed significantly lower LDLs than the other groups. High test-retest reliability of LDL tests was demonstrated, regardless of the type of stimulus used. The cut-off values for screening patients with hyperacusis were 90 dB HL using pure tone stimuli and 62 dB HL using white-band noise stimuli. In study 2, significantly increased LDLs were correlated with improved symptoms and improved scores on tinnitus questionnaires after sound generator use, indicating that LDL measurement is a reliable test for monitoring hyperacusis during an intervention. LDL measurement is a reliable diagnostic tool to reflect the condition of hyperacusis, especially during the course of treatment.

    Citation

    Jaclyn Leigh Vidal, Jung Mee Park, Jae Sang Han, Hamzah Alshaikh, Shi Nae Park. Measurement of Loudness Discomfort Levels as a Test for Hyperacusis: Test-Retest Reliability and Its Clinical Value. Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology. 2022 Feb;15(1):84-90


    PMID: 35144329

    View Full Text