Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

Both peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and implanted port catheters (PORTs) are commonly used for the delivery of immunochemotherapy. We compared the safety of the two types of devices in a homogeneous and monocentric population of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients who were treated with first-line immunochemotherapy by evaluating the numbers of catheter-related venous thromboses (VTs) and infections that occurred in the six months after implantation according to the type of device. Using a propensity score, the adjusted relative risk (ARR) between the type of catheter and the occurrence of catheter-related complications (infection and/or VT) of interest was retrospectively determined. 479 patients were enrolled (266 PORTs/213 PICCs), and 26 VTs (5.4%) and 30 infections (6.3%) were identified in the period following PICC/PORT implantation. The adjusted relative risk (ARR) of catheter-related complications (infection and/or VT) according to the type of device was 2.6 (95% CI =1.3-5.9, p = .0075). This risk increase associated with the PICC device was significant for both infections (ARR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.3-10.9) and thrombosis (ARR = 4; 95% CI = 1.5-11.6). Our study supports the preferential use of PORTs for the first line of treatment for DLBCL patients. © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Citation

Juliette Pénichoux, Julien Rio, Leila Kammoun, Thomas Vermeulin, Louis-Ferdinand Pepin, Vincent Camus, Sydney Dubois, Florian Bouclet, Mustafa Alani, Nathalie Contentin, Stéphane Leprêtre, Aspasia Stamatoullas, Hélène Lanic, Emilie Lemasle, Anne-Lise Ménard, Pascal Lenain, Marie Gilles-Baray, Dragos Georgescu, Florian Clatot, Hervé Tilly, Fabrice Jardin. Retrospective analysis of the safety of peripherally inserted catheters versus implanted port catheters during first-line treatment for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. European journal of haematology. 2022 Jul;109(1):41-49

Expand section icon Mesh Tags


PMID: 35285085

View Full Text