Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

Glioma and brain metastasis can be difficult to distinguish on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to the similarity of imaging features in specific clinical circumstances. Multiple studies have investigated the use of machine learning (ML) models for non-invasive differentiation of glioma from brain metastasis. Many of the studies report promising classification results, however, to date, none have been implemented into clinical practice. After a screening of 12,470 studies, we included 29 eligible studies in our systematic review. From each study, we aggregated data on model design, development, and best classifiers, as well as quality of reporting according to the TRIPOD statement. In a subset of eligible studies, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported AUC. It was found that data predominantly originated from single-center institutions (n = 25/29) and only two studies performed external validation. The median TRIPOD adherence was 0.48, indicating insufficient quality of reporting among surveyed studies. Our findings illustrate that despite promising classification results, reliable model assessment is limited by poor reporting of study design and lack of algorithm validation and generalizability. Therefore, adherence to quality guidelines and validation on outside datasets is critical for the clinical translation of ML for the differentiation of glioma and brain metastasis.

Citation

Leon Jekel, Waverly R Brim, Marc von Reppert, Lawrence Staib, Gabriel Cassinelli Petersen, Sara Merkaj, Harry Subramanian, Tal Zeevi, Seyedmehdi Payabvash, Khaled Bousabarah, MingDe Lin, Jin Cui, Alexandria Brackett, Amit Mahajan, Antonio Omuro, Michele H Johnson, Veronica L Chiang, Ajay Malhotra, Björn Scheffler, Mariam S Aboian. Machine Learning Applications for Differentiation of Glioma from Brain Metastasis-A Systematic Review. Cancers. 2022 Mar 08;14(6)


PMID: 35326526

View Full Text