Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

To examine the association between probiotic use and antimicrobial utilization. We retrospectively evaluated very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants admitted to tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Canada between 2014 and 2019. Our outcome was antimicrobial utilization rate (AUR) defined as number of days of antimicrobial exposure per 1000 patient-days. Of 16,223 eligible infants, 7279 (45%) received probiotics. Probiotic use rate increased from 10% in 2014 to 68% in 2019. The AUR was significantly lower in infants who received probiotics vs those who did not (107 vs 129 per 1000 patient-days, aRR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.81, 0.98]). Among 13,305 infants without culture-proven sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis ≥Stage 2, 5931 (45%) received probiotics. Median AUR was significantly lower in the probiotic vs the no-probiotic group (78 vs 97 per 1000 patient-days, aRR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.74, 0.97]). Probiotic use was associated with a significant reduction in AUR among VLBW infants. © 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Citation

Joseph Y Ting, Eugene W Yoon, Carlos A Fajardo, Thierry Daboval, Valérie Bertelle, Prakesh S Shah, Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) Investigators. Antimicrobial utilization in very-low-birth-weight infants: association with probiotic use. Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2022 Jul;42(7):947-952

Expand section icon Mesh Tags

Expand section icon Substances


PMID: 35399098

View Full Text