Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • air pollutants (2)
  • behavior (2)
  • bottom ash (1)
  • calcium (2)
  • china (1)
  • chromium (17)
  • coal (10)
  • coal ash (2)
  • factor (1)
  • fly ash (2)
  • gas (1)
  • gypsum (2)
  • low (9)
  • power plants (9)
  • trace elements (1)
  • vapor (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    Due to its low vapor pressure, chromium (Cr) mostly emitted as fly ash particles (especially PM2.5) into environment in coal-fired power plants (CFPPs). The ultra-low emission (ULE) control technologies used in current CFPPs may be beneficial to reducing both the regular pollutants and hazardous trace elements (e.g., Cr), but the insight into the removal efficiency of Cr by different upgrading air pollution cleaning devices (APCDs) and the environmental stability of the Cr-bearing wastes produced from those APCDs in the ULE CFPPs has rarely reported. This study investigated and compared the distribution and emission characteristics of Cr in a Chinese CFPP before and after ULE, and the leaching behavior of Cr after ULE retrofitting in combustion byproducts was also revealed. The results showed that Cr was primarily captured in bottom and fly ashes (80.85%), followed by gypsum (0.02%) and sludge from wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) (4.52 × 10-4%), with only 3.02 × 10-8% emitted into the atmosphere. Additional WESP had a large removal efficiency of Cr with the value of 92.04%, and the overall Cr removal efficiency of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment, electrostatic precipitator (ESP), wet flue gas desulphurization (WFGD) system, and WESP equipped after ULE retrofitting was 99.99%. Notably, although the mass percentage of Cr in WESP sludge was negligible, the concentration of Cr in WESP sludge was 324.04 mg/kg. The leaching concentrations of Cr in combustion byproducts were in the descending order: fly ash > WESP sludge > bottom ash > gypsum. The atmospheric emission factor of Cr in the studied power plant was 1.08 mg/t coal, which was significantly lower than those of the CFPPs before ULE retrofitting. Therefore, the ULE retrofitting for CFPP was beneficial to reduce Cr emissions. More attention should be paid to the subsequent processing problem of solid combustion byproducts, especially the WESP sludge. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Citation

    Quan Tang, Liru Chang, Fang He, Chunhui Miao, Liugen Zheng, Dawei Ma, Runfang Wang, Biao Fu. Impact of ultra-low emission retrofitting on partitioning and emission behavior of chromium in a Chinese coal-fired power plant. Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;302:134859

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 35533942

    View Full Text