Trinity review: integrating Registered Reports with research ethics and funding reviews.

One major source of exhaustion for researchers is the redundant paperwork of three different documents-research papers, ethics review applications, and research grant applications-for the same research plan. This is a wasteful and redundant process for researchers, and it has a more direct impact on the career development of early-career researchers. Here, we propose a trinity review system based on Registered Reports that integrates scientific, ethics, and research funding reviews. In our proposed trinity review system, scientific and ethics reviews are undertaken concurrently for a research protocol before running the study. After the protocol is approved in principle through these review processes, a funding review will take place, and the researchers will begin their research. Following the experiments or surveys, the scientific review will be conducted on a completed version of the paper again, including the results and discussions (i.e., the full paper), and the full paper will be published once it has passed the second review. This paper provides the brief process of the trinity review system and discusses the need for and benefits of the proposed system. Although the trinity review system only applies to a few appropriate disciplines, it helps improve reproducibility and integrity. © 2022. The Author(s).

Citation

Yuki Mori, Kaito Takashima, Kohei Ueda, Kyoshiro Sasaki, Yuki Yamada. Trinity review: integrating Registered Reports with research ethics and funding reviews. BMC research notes. 2022 May 19;15(1):184

Mesh Tags

PMID: 35590337

search → result