Impact of Indication for Revision THA on Resource Utilization.

Ittai Shichman, Mark Kurapatti, Mackenzie Roof, Thomas H Christensen, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf

The Journal of arthroplasty 2022 Dec

filter terms:

Demographic variables play an important role in outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Surgical and in-patient variables as well as outcomes vary between indications for rTHA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the indication for the rTHA on costs and postoperative outcomes. This retrospective cohort analysis investigated all patients who underwent unilateral, aseptic rTHA at an academic orthopaedic specialty hospital who had at least 1-year postoperative follow-up. In total, 654 patients were evaluated and categorized based on their indication for aseptic rTHA. Demographics, direct and total procedure costs, surgical factors, postoperative outcomes, and re-revision rates were collected and compared between indications. Younger patients had the greatest leg length discrepancy (LLD) and older patients had the highest incidence of periprosthetic fracture (PPF) (P = .001). The greatest proportion of full revisions were found for LLD (16.7%) and head/polyethylene liner-only revisions for metallosis/adverse tissue reaction (100%). Operative time was significantly longest for LLD revisions and shortest for metallosis/adverse tissue reaction revisions (P < .001). Length of stay was longest for periprosthetic fracture and shortest for LLD and stiffness/heterotopic ossification (P < .001). Re-revision rate was greatest for implant failure and lowest for LLD. Total cost was highest for PPF (148.9%) and lowest for polyethylene liner wear (87.7%). Patients undergoing rTHA for indications such as PPF and aseptic loosening were associated with longer operative times, length of stay and higher total and direct costs. Therefore, they may need increased perioperative attention with respect to resource utilization, risk stratification, surgical planning, and cost-reducing measures. Retrospective Cohort Study. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Citation

Ittai Shichman, Mark Kurapatti, Mackenzie Roof, Thomas H Christensen, Joshua C Rozell, Ran Schwarzkopf. Impact of Indication for Revision THA on Resource Utilization. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2022 Dec;37(12):2333-2339