Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • female (1)
  • humans (1)
  • labour (8)
  • misoprostol (10)
  • out patient (1)
  • pregnancy (2)
  • vagina (1)
  • women (6)
  • χ2 test (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    The aim of this study was to compare nulliparous women's experiences with induction of labour using two different regimens of misoprostol. We adapted a validated questionnaire regarding experience with induced labour. In two different hospitals, 123 women undergoing medical induction of labour completed a questionnaire after delivery. An independent-samples T-test was used for comparison of parametric continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 test was used for categorical data. The two groups differed regarding BMI and pregnancy complications. No adjusted estimates were calculated. Women induced with oral misoprostol experienced more painful induction of labour (p = 0.019) and described feeling that their length of stay at hospital was excessive (p = 0.028). Overall, the experience of giving birth after induction of labour was reported as "good" among 87.8% of women induced with oral misoprostol compared with 72.7% of the women induced with a slow-release misoprostol vaginal insert (p = 0.039). In two departments characterized by several differences, including whether vaginal or oral misoprostol was used, induction with oral misoprostol in an out-patient setting was associated with a better experience of labour than induction with a slow-release misoprostol vaginal insert. Region Zealand Health Scientific Research Foundation supported the study financially. The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02693587 on 26 February 2016 and with EudraCT number 2020-000366-42 on 23 January 2020 (retrospectively registered). Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

    Citation

    Karen H Hansen, Axelina Eriksson, Sarah Jeppesen, Maria Jeppegaard, Lone Krebs. Women's experiences of induction of labour with misoprostol tablets compared with vaginal insert. Danish medical journal. 2023 Jan 24;70(2)

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 36892220

    View Full Text