Mock Juror Perceptions of a Male or Female Adult Rape Victim Crying in the Courtroom.

This study investigated the impact of victim crying and gender on perceptions of rape cases. Participants (N = 240, 51.5% male, 48.1% female) completed a 2 (victim crying) × 2 (victim gender) × 2 (participant gender) between-participants design with case judgments (e.g., verdict) as the DVs. Results found that a rape victim crying during testimony increased pro-victim judgments compared to when the victim did not cry, that female mock jurors were more pro-victim than males, but that victim gender was insignificant. Finally, the mediation model found that victim crying increased their credibility, increasing the likelihood of a guilty verdict.

Citation

Andrea M Pals, Mary M Levi, Johnathan R Meier, Baylee D Jenkins, Alexis M Le Grand, Jonathan M Golding. Mock Juror Perceptions of a Male or Female Adult Rape Victim Crying in the Courtroom. Violence against women. 2023 Apr 03:10778012231166404

PMID: 37013381

search → result