Correlation Engine 2.0
Clear Search sequence regions


  • asthma (3)
  • corticosteroid (1)
  • hormones (2)
  • humans (1)
  • living (1)
  • lung function (1)
  • mild asthma (5)
  • patients (5)
  • research (2)
  • saba (2)
  • therapies (1)
  • Sizes of these terms reflect their relevance to your search.

    Patients living with mild disease represent the largest proportion of asthma patients. There are significant challenges in proposing a definition that would best describe these patients, while also accurately identifying at-risk individuals. Current literature suggests considerable inflammatory and clinical heterogeneity within this group. Research has shown that these patients are at risk of poor control, exacerbations, lung function decline, and death. Despite conflicting data on its prevalence, eosinophilic inflammation appears to be a predictor of poorer outcomes in mild asthma. There is an immediate need to better understand phenotypic clusters in mild asthma. It is also important to understand factors that influence disease progression and remission, as it is evident that both vary in mild asthma. Guided by robust literature that supports inhaled corticosteroid-based strategies over short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) reliant regimens, the management of these patients has evolved considerably. Unfortunately, SABA use remains high in clinical practice despite strong advocacy from the Global Initiative for Asthma. Future mild asthma research should explore the role of biomarkers, develop prediction tools based on composite risk scores, and explore targeted therapies at least for at-risk individuals. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Citation

    Arjun Mohan, Njira L Lugogo. Mild asthma: Lessons learned and remaining questions. Respiratory medicine. 2023 Sep;216:107326

    Expand section icon Mesh Tags

    Expand section icon Substances


    PMID: 37328016

    View Full Text