Genomic representativeness and chimerism in large collections of SAGs and MAGs of marine prokaryoplankton.

Tianyi Chang, Gregory S Gavelis, Julia M Brown, Ramunas Stepanauskas

Microbiome 2024 Jul 15

filter terms:

Single amplified genomes (SAGs) and metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) are the predominant sources of information about the coding potential of uncultured microbial lineages, but their strengths and limitations remain poorly understood. Here, we performed a direct comparison of two previously published collections of thousands of SAGs and MAGs obtained from the same, global environment. We found that SAGs were less prone to chimerism and more accurately reflected the relative abundance and the pangenome content of microbial lineages inhabiting the epipelagic of the tropical and subtropical ocean, as compared to MAGs. SAGs were also better suited to link genome information with taxa discovered through 16S rRNA amplicon analyses. Meanwhile, MAGs had the advantage of more readily recovering genomes of rare lineages. Our analyses revealed the relative strengths and weaknesses of the two most commonly used genome recovery approaches in environmental microbiology. These considerations, as well as the need for better tools for genome quality assessment, should be taken into account when designing studies and interpreting data that involve SAGs or MAGs. Video Abstract. © 2024. The Author(s).

Citation

Tianyi Chang, Gregory S Gavelis, Julia M Brown, Ramunas Stepanauskas. Genomic representativeness and chimerism in large collections of SAGs and MAGs of marine prokaryoplankton. Microbiome. 2024 Jul 15;12(1):126